Application of fmea-topsis-ahp methods to determine RPN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61799/2216-0388.629Keywords:
AHP, FMEA, TOPSIS, multi-criteria decisionAbstract
Multi-criteria decision methods for risk assessment are a basic tool for decision making in the industrial world. In this research we are going to be central in the combination and application of three widely used methods for improving decision-making in the industry, the methods in which we are going to work are "Failure Mode and Effect Analysis", "Technique for the order of preference due to similarity with the ideal solution "and finally " Analytical hierarchy process ".
Downloads
References
N. R.-F. G. &. O.-G. J. C. Tabares-Urrea, "AHP difuso y TOPSIS para la selección de un proveedor 3PL considerando el riesgo operacional", Revista EIA, vol. 17, nº 33, pp. 89-105, 2020
K.T.L.C.X.M.H.S.L. &. Z.M.L. Xu, "Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 75, nº 1, pp. 17-29, 2002
L. Hu-Chen, "FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods", de In FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods, Singapore, Springer, 2016, pp. 13-27
H.-C. L. L. a. N. L. Liu, "Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review" Expert systems with applications, vol. 40, nº 2, pp. 828-838, 2013
J.M. Legg, "Computerized approach for matrix-form FMEA", IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 27, nº 4, pp. 254-257, 1978
F. a. M. G. Franceschini, "A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA", International Journal of Production Research, vol. 39, nº 13, pp. 2991-3002, 2001
J. K. Chen, "Prioritization of corrective actions from utility viewpoint in FMEA application", Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 33, nº 4, pp. 883-894, 19 11 2017
K. Onodera, "Effective techniques of FMEA at each life-cycle stage", de Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1997
H. C. L. &. Y. K., Multiple Attibute Decision Methods and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1981
S. T. G.-H. Opricovic, "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS(Article)", European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, nº 2, pp. 445-455, 2004
M. O. S. K. Y. M. &. I. J. Behzadian, "A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications", Expert Systems with applications, vol. 39, nº 17, pp. 13051-13069, 2012
C. T. Chen, "Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment", Fuzzy sets and systems, vol. 114, nº 1, pp. 1-9, 2000
L. L.-C. D. V.-R. D. H. H. J. I. &. R. B. M. I. Pérez-Domínguez, "Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term and TOPSIS to assess lean performance", Applied Sciences, vol. 9, nº 5, p. 873, 2019
A. S. C. ,. D. P. &. G. Mendoza, "Aplicación del proceso de jerarquía analítica (AHP) para la toma de decisión con juicios de expertos", Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, vol. 27, nº 3, pp. 348-360, 05 2019
T. L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications, 2008
D.Y. Chang, "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP", European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, nº 3, pp. 649-655, 1996
S. A. Berumen y F. Llamazares Redondo, "La utilidad de los métodos de decisión multicriterio (como el ahp) en un entorno de competitividad", Cuadernos de Administración, vol. XX, nº 34, pp. 65-87, 2007
V.O.S. y K.S, "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications", European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 169, nº 1, pp. 1-29, 2006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
